New screenshots ~_~

[EvilTaru]

http://www.jeux-france.com/news16326...en-images.html

The chimera designs are pretty good, but the environments still look flat, need more lighting and shadowing in sharper contrast, especially in the open field level, the effects are too subtle, definitely needs more shadows.

[aronlennon]

http://www.jeux-france.com/news16326_resistance-fall-of-man-en-images.html

The chimera designs are pretty good, but the environments still look flat, need more lighting and shadowing in sharper contrast, especially in the open field level, the effects are too subtle, definitely needs more shadows.

Nice find! You should post this in the Resistance: Fall of Man Ultimate Info Thread V2.

This sure will add to those old pictures on there right now.

[somenobody]

I'm going to update the thread now. Thanks for your contribution.

[Elwar]

The chimera designs are the only thing that one could possibly say is good about those screenshots. I can't believe this pile o' puke comes from Insomniac. 2003 called, they want their game engine back.

I'll expand on your list EvilTaru, Needs:
-Lighting period.
-Soft shadows. And a hell of a lot more in general.
-Any type of effect, period (you can't count that pathetic muzzle flash as an effect).
-Textures that aren't a) Blurry and b) crap.
-Human designs that don't have pasted on faces reminiscent of Goldeneye (64).
-Grittiness. More bland environments shown off. Wheres the WOW factor.
-POLYGONS!


Do not release this game at launch if you can't make it match an Xbox360 launch game, graphically. Gameplay similarly, as I posted a thread on, is not up to snuff. This is looking like a trainwreck in the making. I just can't understand why any developer would want to release screens/media of a game in this state, period. There has been NO positive feedback on forums from this game so far.

Its looking as bad as the "wallguy" screens (PDZ E3 2005), and Resistance has had a year more for "progress". How the hell is this meant to compare to Halo 3 again? Or BIA? Or MOH? Those games looks about a bazillion times more polished already. And since you've known been preparing this for release at the PS3 launch, theres zero excuses at this late stage of the game.

[somenobody]

Do not release this game at launch if you can't make it match an Xbox360 launch game, graphically.

Graphics aren't everything (although they definitely rock). Remember, Resistance is in the first generation of PS3 games. The graphics will be totally awesome next year.

There has been NO positive feedback on forums from this game so far.

That's because all of the people talking about RFoM on forums (besides these) are all obsessed with the graphics. They're good, but now "wow." They still have a good five months before the game comes out - it'll get polished a bit. And even if the graphics don't beat Gears of War's, so what?

How the hell is this meant to compare to Halo 3 again? Or BIA? Or MOH? Those games looks about a bazillion times more polished already. And since you've known been preparing this for release at the PS3 launch, theres zero excuses at this late stage of the game.

Chill man, it's a launch title. The graphics probably aren't going to be groundbreaking, but they'll be great. The 360's been out for a while, so developers obviously have had more time with the dev kits.

I love graphics too man, but there's more than that.

[Mr. Brightside]

The chimera designs are the only thing that one could possibly say is good about those screenshots. I can't believe this pile o' puke comes from Insomniac. 2003 called, they want their game engine back.

I'll expand on your list EvilTaru, Needs:
-Lighting period.
-Soft shadows. And a hell of a lot more in general.
-Any type of effect, period (you can't count that pathetic muzzle flash as an effect).
-Textures that aren't a) Blurry and b) crap.
-Human designs that don't have pasted on faces reminiscent of Goldeneye (64).
-Grittiness. More bland environments shown off. Wheres the WOW factor.
-POLYGONS!


Do not release this game at launch if you can't make it match an Xbox360 launch game, graphically. Gameplay similarly, as I posted a thread on, is not up to snuff. This is looking like a trainwreck in the making. I just can't understand why any developer would want to release screens/media of a game in this state, period. There has been NO positive feedback on forums from this game so far.

Its looking as bad as the "wallguy" screens (PDZ E3 2005), and Resistance has had a year more for "progress". How the hell is this meant to compare to Halo 3 again? Or BIA? Or MOH? Those games looks about a bazillion times more polished already. And since you've known been preparing this for release at the PS3 launch, theres zero excuses at this late stage of the game.

I'm sorry, but get the hell of the internet. It's a discrace you would compare this game to the travesty of Perfect Dark Zero. Go back to the Xbox forums, and come back when you have some sense to talk about games.

[EvilTaru]

Do not release this game at launch if you can't make it match an Xbox360 launch game, graphically.

Graphics aren't everything (although they definitely rock). Remember, Resistance is in the first generation of PS3 games. The graphics will be totally awesome next year.

There has been NO positive feedback on forums from this game so far.

That's because all of the people talking about RFoM on forums (besides these) are all obsessed with the graphics. They're good, but now "wow." They still have a good five months before the game comes out - it'll get polished a bit. And even if the graphics don't beat Gears of War's, so what?

How the hell is this meant to compare to Halo 3 again? Or BIA? Or MOH? Those games looks about a bazillion times more polished already. And since you've known been preparing this for release at the PS3 launch, theres zero excuses at this late stage of the game.

Chill man, it's a launch title. The graphics probably aren't going to be groundbreaking, but they'll be great. The 360's been out for a while, so developers obviously have had more time with the dev kits.

I love graphics too man, but there's more than that.

I wonder if they're waiting for the final kits before implementing some things, but I really hope they work on the lighting and shadowing as well as the ground textures before the game releases.

[-Tearless Sky-]

Wtf?! Those graphics are amazing!

[Elwar]

Graphics aren't everything (although they definitely rock). Remember, Resistance is in the first generation of PS3 games. The graphics will be totally awesome next year.

Of course graphics aren't everything, but they're certainly an enormous part in creating the atmosphere of a title. Btw, that post was focussed on the graphics because there is not much else to discern from screenshots.

That's because all of the people talking about RFoM on forums (besides these) are all obsessed with the graphics. They're good, but now "wow." They still have a good five months before the game comes out - it'll get polished a bit. And even if the graphics don't beat Gears of War's, so what?

Theres been quite a bit of discussion on the gameplay on forums I frequent, none of which is favourable for reasons obvious. The gameplay does not look engaging yet and I've posted a thread re: that after watching the E3 media. But I digress, I would not have posted such a tirade if these graphics were 'good'. They're not, they're bad. And then some. Terribly underwhelming at best.

Chill man, it's a launch title. The graphics probably aren't going to be groundbreaking, but they'll be great. The 360's been out for a while, so developers obviously have had more time with the dev kits.

Great - or even decent - is all I ask. I hold no water with the devkit excuse, primarily because its a fact Insomniac was one of the first PS3 developers (we learnt this game was in development in late 2004 and my expectations and personal hype have been growing ever since) and that other developers - particularly Ninja Theory with Heavenly Sword - have already shown the goods on PS3.

The first-generation card can only be played so much. There are games coming out now that look much better, and PS3 games scheduled for the "launch window" that put this to shame.

I love graphics too man, but there's more than that.

Very true. But if you have an issue but don't speak out against mediocrity then who will? The forums are here for feedback.

Thanks for the reasonable and level-headed reply, btw

I'm sorry, but get the hell of the internet. It's a discrace you would compare this game to the travesty of Perfect Dark Zero. Go back to the Xbox forums, and come back when you have some sense to talk about games.

Um, yeah, I'm an unbiased gamer and am not registered on any Xbox forums, I understand the compulsion to defend a title you've been following for ages, but take a step back buddy. A little bit more complaining and you might work positive changes on the title, you realise.

[Ruchrono]

....The graphics are fine. I actually found no lack of anything you complained about, including effects, Elwar. Might want to renew your perscription contacts or glasses.

Either way, you need to stop hyping yourself up for the game. Once again, another person is expecting the game to be perfect when it's not going to be. =/